<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Not Necessarily Dot Net : newb, theory, coding</title><link>http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/newb/theory/coding/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: newb, theory, coding</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>C++ Virtual Inheritance</title><link>http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/2010/10/04/4074.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ceb7fe2a-c56b-4d85-99e6-8dd548580538:4074</guid><dc:creator>JamesAshley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=4074</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/2010/10/04/4074.aspx#comments</comments><description>I don&amp;#39;t know what the odds are that anyone actually having this problem will run across this on google. But maybe someone will read it and remember before-hand. I have an inheritance hierarchy something like Interface -&amp;gt; ABC -&amp;gt; C -&amp;gt; D. Each...(&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/2010/10/04/4074.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4074" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/coding/default.aspx">coding</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/theory/default.aspx">theory</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/newb/default.aspx">newb</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/Not+Dot+Net/default.aspx">Not Dot Net</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/c_2B002B00_/default.aspx">c++</category></item><item><title>VB.NET vs C#</title><link>http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/2008/08/03/VB.NET-vs.-C_2300_.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ceb7fe2a-c56b-4d85-99e6-8dd548580538:651</guid><dc:creator>JamesAshley</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=651</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/2008/08/03/VB.NET-vs.-C_2300_.aspx#comments</comments><description>On the Google App Engine mailing list (of all places...in case you don&amp;#39;t know, that&amp;#39;s a python-only platform), I ran across this exchange recently:

&amp;gt; &amp;gt; VB.NET is inelegant.
&amp;gt; yeah I know I have C# it&amp;#39;s more advanced,

Now, this is one of those common stereotypes that irritate me. So I figured it was time to take a stick to that dead horse again....(&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/2008/08/03/VB.NET-vs.-C_2300_.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=651" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/best+practices/default.aspx">best practices</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/coding/default.aspx">coding</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/theory/default.aspx">theory</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/newb/default.aspx">newb</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/VB/default.aspx">VB</category></item><item><title>Empty try/catch blocks</title><link>http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/2008/02/06/476.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ceb7fe2a-c56b-4d85-99e6-8dd548580538:476</guid><dc:creator>JamesAshley</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=476</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/2008/02/06/476.aspx#comments</comments><description>I&amp;#39;ve seen several people do this, and it&amp;#39;s always been a big clue to me that they&amp;#39;re very new and inexperienced with .net. There are a few variations. try { blah; } catch {} That&amp;#39;s probably the absolute worst. Your exception disappears...(&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/2008/02/06/476.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=476" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/best+practices/default.aspx">best practices</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/coding/default.aspx">coding</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/theory/default.aspx">theory</category><category domain="http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/jamesashley/archive/tags/newb/default.aspx">newb</category></item></channel></rss>